BestCraps.com

Gambling Proposal Rejected in New Hampshire

Posted on April 22nd, 2010

News Sponsored by Online Vegas Casino

Rated 5 Stars by BestCraps.com

Read Review

Visit Casino

Download Software

————————————————

With the high unemployment rate that the United States is dealing with at this time, many states are looking into ways to address this from a legislative perspective. This can impact the development and creation of new jobs to allow citizens to improve their situation. New Hampshire is no exception and one of the avenues they deliberated on is an expanded gambling legislation.

This suffered a major setback as the House voted 212-158 against the proposal although many supporters thought this that this would pass the scrutiny of the House compared to previous proposals.

Highly Flawed

The bill called for the installation of video slot machines in six facilities located in the state of New Hampshire sponsored by Sen. Lou D’Allesandro (Dem. – Manchester). He called this bill an economic development package. The bill would have allowed for at most 17,000 video slot machines, a golf course resort with two more sites to be determined at New Hampshire.

Rep. John DeJoie, (Dem. – Concord) and Rep. Kenneth Weyler, (Rep. – Kingston) suggested that this would be one way to ease the unemployment problem of the state and solve the state’s budget issues but in the end, many of the legislators weren’t convinced with these arguments.

Rep. Andrew Peterson, (Rep. – Peterborough) opposed the bill recalling that there are states who legalized video slot machines where crime rate, unemployment and taxes continues to increase, which is the opposite of what many supporters of the bill claim. On Wednesday, majority of the legislators voted against the bill because they feel it is a flawed bill.

The margin of 54 votes was a resounding success to staunch opponents of the bill. The major concern among the legislators was how this industry would be regulated. There were also comments that the bill was too good to be true and in these trying times, they don’t want to go back start blaming themselves for faulty judgment where the intent to improve the unemployment rate but failure to look at repercussions could be their downfall. This opens the door to opportunities to further improve the bill.

Governor Threatened Veto

Earlier in the week, Gov. John Lynch announced that he would choose to veto the bill on expanding gambling in New Hampshire which the Senate passed. This announcement put the legislators on a mad scramble to review and revise the plan. Despite the House finally voting against the bill, proponents of gambling will have to start looking at crafting a bill that can help sway neutral legislators on their side.

Voting against this bill does not necessarily mean that legislators are against the concept of expanded gambling. While they need to deal with increasing revenues for the state, they feel that they can still benefit from a well-crafted bill than passing a flawed bill.

One can expect to see more bills to be reviewed and hopefully pass voting in both the Senate and Lower House. There had been much talk about lawmakers jealously eyeing as other states such as Rhode Island and Connecticut, where casinos bring in millions in state revenues. Now, supporters of expanded gambling including the group Fix it Now New Hampshire is grumbling about the movements of casinos in Massachusetts.

The group hopes to sway legislators to allow racetrack casinos and slot machines at six different sites in the state to allow its citizens to get jobs while generating revenues for the state’s development. A flier was circulated showing a man smiling with the caption thanking New Hampshire for allowing Massachusetts to get ahead with casinos and the expected revenues that went with it.